| A policymaker's primer on education research: How to understand, evaluate and use it. Retrieved April 25, 2007 from http://www.ecs.org/html/educationIssues/Research/primer/analyzingflowchart.asp. |
| Allal, L., & Lopez, L. M. (2005). Formative assessment of learning: A review of publications in French. In Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (Ed.), Formative assessment: Improving learning in secondary classrooms. Centre for Educational Research and Innovation. |
| American Association of School Administrators. (2002). Using data to improve schools: What's working. Arlington, VA: KSA-Plus Communications. Retrieved December 1, 2006 from http://aasa.files.cms-plus.com/PDFs/Publications/UsingDataToImproveSchools.pdf |
| American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association. |
| American School Board Journal. Retrieved April 8, 2006 from http://www.asbj.com |
| Anderson, J., Goertz, M. E., Goldwasser, M., Hovde, K., Massell, D., Mueller, J. A., et al. (2006). SchoolNet: A case study of implementation in three schools. Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education. |
| Anderson, S., Fowler, D., & Klein, S., et al. (2005). Judging student achievement: Why getting the right data matters. Washington, DC: MPR/NCEA. Retrieved December 7, 2006 from http://www.dataqualitycampaign.org/files/Tools-Judging_Student_Achievement.pdf |
| Armstrong, J., & Anthes, K. (2001). Identifying the factors, conditions and policies that support schools' use of data for decision-making and school improvement. Denver: Education Commission of the States. Retrieved April 8, 2006 from http://www.ecs.org/clearinghouse/30/69/3069.htm |
| Armstrong, J., Anthes, K. (2001). How data can help. American School Board Journal 188(11), 38-41. |
| Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice (1998, March). Special issue on assessment and classroom learning 5(1). |
| Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. (2003, February). Using data to improve student achievement. Educational Leadership, 60(5). Retrieved April 9, 2006 from http://www.ascd.org/portal/site/ascd/menuitem.459dee008f99653fb85516f762108a0c/ |
| Bagley, S.S. (2008). High school students' perceptions of narrative evaluations as summative assessment. American Secondary Education, 36(3), 15-32. |
| Bailey, A.L., & Heritage, M. (2008). Formative assessment for literacy grades K-6: Building reading and academic language skills across the curriculum. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. |
| Baker, E.L, & Linn, R.L. (2002). Validity issues for accountabilty systems. (CSE Tech. Rep. No. 585). Los Angeles, CA: Center for the Study of Evaluation and National Center for Student Testing. Retrieved October 27, 2008 from http://www.cse.ucla.edu/products/summary.asp?report=585 |
| Bandura, A., Schunk, D.H. (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and in- trinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(3), 586-598. |
| Bangert-Drowns, R., Kulik, J., & Morgan, M. (1991). The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research, 61, 213-238. |
| Barnes, F. D. (2004).Inquiry and action: Making school improvement part of daily practice. Annenberg Institute for School Reform, Brown University. |
| Bell, B. & Cowie, B. (2000). The characteristics of formative assessment in science education. New York, NY: John Wiley. |
| Bell, B. & Cowie, B. (2001). The characteristics of formative assessment in science education. Science Education, 85, 536-553. Retrieved on April 30, 2008 from: http://www.d.umn.edu/~bmunson/Courses/Educ5560/readings/BellSciEd01-85-536.pdf |
| Bennett, N., Wise, C., Woods, P., & Harvey, J. (2003). Distributed leadership (full report). Oxford, UK: National College for School Leadership. |
| Bernhardt, V. (1999). The school portfolio: A comprehensive framework for school improvement (2nd ed.). Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education. |
| Bernhardt, V. (2006). Using data to improve student learning in school districts. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education, Inc. |
| Bernhardt, V. L. (2003). No schools left behind. Educational Leadership, 60(5), pp. 26-30. |
| Bernhardt, V. L. (2003). Using data to improve student learning in elementary schools. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education, Inc. |
| Bernhardt, V. L. (2004). Data analysis for comprehensive schoolwide improvement. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education. |
| Bernhardt, V. L. (2007). Translating data into information to improve teaching and learning. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education. |
| Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan 80(2), 139-144. |
| Black, P. (1999). Assessment, learning theories and testing systems. In P. Murphy (Ed.), Learners, Learning and Assessment. London: Open University Press. |
| Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 5(1), 7-74. |
| Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. New York, NY: Open University Press. |
| Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2004). Working inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the classroom. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(1), 9-21. |
| Black, P., McCormick, R., James, M., & Pedder, D. (2006, June). Learning how to learn and assessment for learning: A theoretical inquiry. Research Papers in Education, 21(2), 119-132. |
| Blank, R. K. & DEC Project Team (2004). Data on enacted curriculum study: Summary of Findings. Retrieved April 8, 2006 from http://www.ccsso.org/content/pdfs/DECStudy.pdf |
| Boston, C. (2002). The concept of formative assessment. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 8(9). Retrieved May 15, 2008 from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=8&n=9 |
| Boudett, K. P. & Steele, J. L. (2007). Data wise in action: Stories of schools using data to improve teaching and learning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press. |
| Boudett, K. P., City, E. A., & Murnane, R. J. (Eds.). (2005). Data wise: A step-by-step guide to using assessment results to improve teaching and learning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Publishing Group. 1-891792-67-9 |
| Boudett, K.P., Murnane, R., City, E., & Mood, L. (2005, May). Teaching educators: How to use student assessment data to improve instruction. Phi Delta Kappan 86(9), 700-706. |
| Breiter, A., & Light, D. (2006). Data for school improvement: Factors for designing effective information systems to support decision-making in schools. Educational Technology & Society, 9(3), 206-217. Retrieved December 7, 2006 from http://www.ifets.info/journals/9_3/18.pdf |
| Brookhart, S. M. (2005, April). Research on formative classroom assessment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal. |
| Brookhart, S. M. (2007). Expanding views about formative classroom assessment: A review of the literature. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), Formative classroom assessment: Research, theory and practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press. |
| Brookhart, S. M. (2007). Feedback that fits. Educational Leadership, 64(4), 54-59. |
| Brookhart, S., Moss, C., & Long, B. (2008). Formative assessment that empowers. Educational Leadership, 66(3), 52-57. |
| Brookhart, S.M. (2003). Developing measurement theory for classroom assessment purposes and uses. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 22(4), 5-1. |
| Brown, G. T., Hirschfed, G. H. (2008, March). Students' conceptions of assessment: Links to outcomes. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 15(1), 3-17. |
| Brown, S., Rust, C. and Gibbs, G. (1994) Involving students in the assessment process, in Strategies for Diversifying Assessments in Higher Education. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff Development, and at DeLiberation. |
| Brunner, C., Fasca, C., Heinze, J., Honey, M., Light, D., Mandinach, E. et al. (2005). Linking data and learning: The Grow Network study. Journal of Education for Students Placed At Risk, 10, 241-267. |
| Brunner, C., Fasca, C., Heinze, J., Honey, M., Light, D., Mardinach, E., & Wexler, D.(2005). Linking data and learning: The grow network study. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR) 10(3), 241-267. Retrieved February 22, 2007 from http://www.leaonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1207/s15327671espr1003_2 |
| Buckendahl, C. W., Plake, B. S., & Impara, J. C. (2004). A strategy for evaluating district developed assessments for state accountability. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices, 23(2), 17-25. Retrieved January 15, 2007 from http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2004.tb00155.x |
| Butler, R., & Neuman, O. (1995). Effects of task and ego achievement goals on help-seeking behaviors and attitudes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(2), 261-267. |
| California Comprehensive Center (June 2006). Data-driven decision making based on curriculum-embedded assessment: Findings from recent California studies. Retrieved from http://www.cacompcenter.org/pdf/cacc_dddm.pdf |
| Cameron, J., & Pierce, W.D. (1994, Autumn). Reinforcement, reward, and intrinsic motivation: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 64(3), 363-423. |
| Carless, D. (2007). Conceptualizing pre-emptive formative assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 14(2), 171-184. |
| Casserly, M. (2006). Beating the odds: A city-by-city analysis of student performance and achievement gaps on state assessments. Results from the 2004-2005 school year. Washington, DC: Council of Great City Schools. |
| Cawelti, G., & Protheroe, N. (2001). High student achievement: How six school districts changed into high-performance systems. Arlington, VA: Educational Research Service. |
| Celio, M. B. & Harvey, J. (2005). Buried treasure: Developing a management guide from mountains of school data. University of Washington. Seattle, WA. |
| Center on Education Policy (2007). Educational architects: Do state education agencies have the tools necessary to implement NCLB? Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved March 21, 2008 from http://www.ecs.org/clearinghouse/74/03/7403.pdf |
| Chan, L. (2004). Preventing problems: The best defense for your information system is good planning and continued care. Retrieved April 8, 2006 from http://www.asbj.com/specialreports/0904SpecialReports/S3.html |
| Chappuis, J. (2005). Helping students understand assessment. Educational Leadership, 63(3), 39-43. Retrieved September 7, 2007 from http://www.ascd.org/authors/ed_lead/el200511_chappuis.html |
| Chappuis, S. & Chappuis, J. (2007). The best value in formative assessment. Educational Leadership, 65(4), 14-19. |
| Charles A. Dana Center, University of Texas at Austin, Hope for Urban Education: A Study of Nine High-Performing, High-Poverty, Urban Elementary Schools (Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Education, Planning and Evaluation Service, 1999). Retrieved February 13, 2008 from http://www.ed.gov/pubs/urbanhope/index.html |
| Chen, E., Heritage, M., & Lee, J. (2005). Identifying and monitoring students' learning needs with technology. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR) 10(3), 309-332. Retrieved February 22, 2007 from http://www.leaonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1207/s15327671espr1003_6 |
| Chester, M. D. (2005). Making valid and consistent inferences about school effectiveness from multiple measures. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 24(4), 40-52. Retrieved January 15, 2007 from http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2005.00022.x |
| Choppin, J. (2002, April 2). Data use in practice: Examples from the school level. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. Retrieved April 8, 2006 from http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/archive/mps/AERA2002/data_use_in_practice.htm |
| Chrispeels, J. H., Brown, J. H., & Castillo, S. (2000). School leadership teams: Factors that influence their development and effectiveness. In G.M. Crow, & K. Leithwood (Eds.) Understanding Schools as Intelligent Systems, 4, 39-73, JAI Press. |
| Clarke, S. (2005). Formative assessment in the secondary classroom. Manchester: Hodder Murray. |
| Clements, B., & Nadeau, G. (2006). Optimal reference guide: Guidelines for accessing student records in a state longitudinal database. Part III. Austin, TX: ESP Solutions Group. Retrieved June 14, 2007 from http://www.espsolutionsgroup.com/resources.php |
| Clymer, J. B., & Wiliam, D. (2007). Improving the way we grade science. Educational Leadership, 64, 36-42. |
| Coburn, C. E., & Talbert, J. E. (2006). Conceptions of evidence use in school districts: Mapping the terrain. American Journal of Education 112(4), 469-495. |
| Coburn, C. E., Honig, M. I., & Stein, M. K. (in press). What is the evidence on districts' use of evidence? In J. Bransford, L. Gomez, D. Lam, & N. Vye (Eds.) Research and practice: Towards a reconciliation. Cambridge: Harvard Educational Press. |
| Coburn, C.E., Toure, J. & Yamashita, M. (in press). Evidence, interpretation, and persuasion: Instructional decision making at the district central office. Teachers College Record. |
| Cohen, D. K. (1995). What is the system in systemic reform? Educational Researcher 24(9), 11-17. |
| Colgan, Craig. (2004). Data on demand: Student information systems become a key tool for crunching and analyzing data. Retrieved April 8, 2006 from http://www.asbj.com/specialreports/0904SpecialReports/S1.html |
| Consortium for School Networking (2003). Vision to know and do: The power of data as a tool in educational decision making. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved September 30, 2008, from http://www-03.ibm.com/industries/education/doc/content/bin/dddm_paper.pdf |
| Consortium for School Networking. (n.d.). How ready are you? A special tool for school district leaders to assess readiness to use data effectively. Retrieved July 31, 2006 from http://www.3d2know.org/assessment/survey.cfm |
| Copland, M. (2003). Leadership of inquiry: Building and sustaining capacity for school improvement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 25(Winter), 375-395. Retrieved May 8, 2007 from http://epa.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/4/375.pdf |
| Corcoran, T., Fuhrman, S. H., Belcher, C. L. (2001). The district role in instructional improvement. Phi Delta Kappan 83(September), 78-84. Retrieved May 8, 2007 from http://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1006&context=gse_pubs |
| Council of Chief State School Officers. Administrative data improvement. Retrieved May 19, 2006 from http://www.ccsso.org/projects/administrative_data_improvement/ |
| Cromey, A. (2000). Using student assessment data: What can we learn from schools? Policy Issues, Issue 6. |
| Crooks, T. J. (1988, Winter). The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Review of Educational Research, 58(4), 438-481. |
| Crumrine, T., & Demers, C. (2007, September). Formative assessment: Redirecting the plan. Science Teacher, 74(6), 28-32. |
| CUNY: Information Competency Tutorials. Retrieved April 25, 2007 from http://qcpages.qc.edu/library/olstutorial/02_define/M2A.html. |
| Dailey, D., Fleischman, S., Gil, L., Holtzman, D., O'Day, J., & Vosmer, C. (2005). Toward more effective school districts: A review of the knowledge base. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research. Retrieved May 08, 2007 from http://www.air.org/projects/Toward%20More%20Effective%20Scchool%20Districts-A%20Review%20of%20the%20Knowledge%20Base%206-14-05%20313%20pm.pdf |
| Data Coach website. Retrieved June 24, 2008 from http://www.aea10.k12.ia.us/datacoach/index.html. |
| Data Quality Campaign. (2005). Creating a longitudinal data system: Using data to improve student achievement. Austin, TX: National Center for Educational Accountability. Retrieved July 31, 2006 from http://www.dataqualitycampaign.org/files/Publications-Creating_Longitudinal_Data_System.pdf |
| Data Quality Campaign. (2006). Building student-level longitudinal data systems: Lessons learned from four states. Austin, TX: National Center for Educational Accountability. |
| Datnow, A., Park, V., & Wohlstetter, P. (2007). Achieving with data: How high-performing school systems use data to improve instruction for elementary students. Center on Educational Governance, Rossier School of Education, University of Southern California. Retrieved February 16, 2007 from http://www.newschools.org/viewpoints/AchievingWithData.pdf |
| Deal, T.E. & Peterson, K.D. (1999). Shaping school culture: The heart of leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Education. |
| Dembosky, J. W., Pane, J. F., Barney, H., Christina, R. (2005). Data drive decisionmaking in Southwestern Pennsylvania school districts. RAND Corporation. Retrieved March 2, 2007 from http://www.rand.org/pubs/working_papers/2006/RAND_WR326.sum.pdf |
| Desimone, L., Porter, A. C., Birman, B.F., Garet, M.S., & Yoon, K.S. (2002). How do district management and implementation strategies relate to the quality of the professional development that districts provide to teachers? Teachers College Record, 104(7), 1265-1312. |
| Dixon, H. & Williams, R. (2003). Teachers' understanding and use of formative assessment in literacy learning. New Zealand Annual Review of Education,12:2002. Retrieved May 15, 2008 from http://www.tki.org.nz/r/assessment/research/pdf/DixonWilliams_NZ%20Annualreview_article19Dec03.pdf |
| Dougherty, C. (2008). The power of longitudinal data: Measuring student academic growth. National Center for Educational Accountability, Data Quality Campaign. |
| DuFour, R. (2001). In the right context: The effective leader concentrates on a foundation of programs, procedures, beliefs, expectations, and habits. Journal of Staff Development 22(1). Retrieved May 08, 2007 from http://www.nsdc.org/library/publications/jsd/dufour221.cfm (Reprinted with permission of the National Staff Development Council, www.nsdc.org, 2009. All rights reserved.) |
| Dunifon, R. (2005). How to read a research article. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Cooperative Extension. Retrieved April 25, 2008 from http://www.citra.org/Assets/documents/How%20to%20Read%20a%20Research%20Article.pdf. |
| Dunn, K. E., & Mulvenon, S. W. (2009). A critical review of research on formative assessments: The limited scientific evidence of the impact of formative assessments in education. Practical Assessment, Research, & Evaluation, 14(7), 1-11. |
| Dweck, C.S. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality and development. Philadelphia: Psychology Press. |
| Dwyer, C.A. (Ed.). (2006). The future of assessment: Shaping, teaching, and learning. Mahway, NJ: Erlbaum. |
| Earl, L., & Fullan, M. (2003). Using data in leadership for learning. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(3), 383-394. |
| Earl, L., & Katz, S. (2002). Leading schools in a data-rich world. In K. Leithwood & P. Hallinger (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational leadership administration (1003-1022). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. |
| Easton, L.B. (2008). Mix it up: Variety is key to a well-rounded data-analysis plan. Journal of Staff Development, 29(4), 21-24. |
| Eberle, F., & Keeley, P. (2008, January). Formative assessment probes. Science and Children, 45(5), 50-54. |
| Educational Assessment. (2006). M. Heritage & A. Bailey (Eds.). Special Issue: Assessing to Teach, 3-4(11). |
| Elmore, G.C., Holloway, J.R., & Workman, S.B. (2006). Vision, data, and analysis: An administrative structure for decision making. Educational Research Series: Issue 11. Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research. Retrieved September 23, 2008, from http://www.educause.edu/content |
| Elmore, R. F. (2003). Doing the right thing, knowing the right thing to do: School improvement and performance-based accountability. Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices. |
| Englert, K., Fries, D., Goodwin, B., & Martin-Glenn, M. (2003). Understanding how superintendents use data in a new environment of accountability. Aurora, CO: Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning. |
| Englert, K., Fries, D., Goodwin, B., Martin-Glenn, M., Michael, S. (2004). Understanding how principals use data in a new environment of accountability. Aurora, CO: Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning. |
| Englert, K., Fries, D., Martin-Glenn, M., & Michael, S. (2005). How are Educators Using Data? A Comparative Analysis of Superintendent, Principal, and Teachers' Perceptions of Accountability Systems. Aurora, CO: Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning. |
| Even, R. (2005). Using assessment to inform instructional decisions: How hard can it be? Mathematics Education Research Journal, 17(3), 45-61. |
| Fashola, O. S. (2004). Being an informed consumer of quantitative educational research. Phi Delta Kappan, 85(7), pp. 532-538. |
| Feldman, A., & Capobianco, B. M. (2007, November). Teacher learning of technology enhanced formative assessment. Journal of Science Education and Technology. Retrieved October 28, 2008 from http://www.springerlink.com/content/p8863455668557t2/fulltext.pdf |
| Feldman, J., & Tung, R. (2001). Whole school reform: How schools use the data-based inquiry and decision making process. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA. |
| Felner, R.D., Bolton, N., Seitsinger, A.M., Brand, S., & Burns, A. (2008). Creating a statewide educational data system for accountability and improvement: A comprehensive information and assessment system for making evidence-based changes at school, district, and policy levels. Psychology in the Schools, 45(3), 235-256. |
| Foegen, A., & Deno, S.L. (2001). Identifying growth indicators for low-achieving students in middle school mathematics. The Journal of Special Education, 35(1), 4-16. |
| Frisbie, D. A. (2005). Measurement 101: Some fundamentals revisited. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 23(2), 21-28. Retrieved January 15, 2007 from http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2005.00016.x |
| Fuchs, L. S. (2004). The past, present, and future of curriculum-based measurement research. School Psychology Review, 33(2), 188-192. |
| Fuchs, L.S. Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C.L., Phillips, N.B., & Bentz, J. (1994). Classwide curriculum-based measurement: Helping general educators meet the challenge of student diversity. Exceptional Children, 60, 518-537. Retrieved November 29, 2008 from http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb3130/is_n6_v60/ai_n28638481 |
| Fullan, M. (2000, April). The three stories of education reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 81(8), 581-584. Retrieved February 13, 2008 from http://www.pdkintl.org/kappan/kful0004.htm |
| Gallagher, C., & Worth, P. (2008, December). Formative assessment policies, programs, and practices in the Southwest Region (Issues & Answers Report, REL 2008-No. 041). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Southwest. Retrieved October 28, 2008 from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs |
| Gallagher, L., Means, B., & Padilla, C. (2008). Teachers' use of student data systems to improve instruction: 2005 to 2007. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development. |
| Gardner, J. (Ed.). (2006). Assessment and Learning. London: Sage Publications, Ltd. |
| Garmston, R.J. (2005). Group wise: Create a culture of inquiry and develop productive groups. JSD, 26(2). Retrieved February 13, 2008 from http://www.nsdc.org/library/publications/jsd/garmston262.cfm (Reprinted with permission of the National Staff Development Council, www.nsdc.org, 2009. All rights reserved.) |
| Garrison, C., & Ehringhaus, M. (2009). Formative and summative assessment in the classroom. National Middle School Association. Retrieved October 12, 2009, from http://www.nmsa.org/Publications/WebExclusive/Assessment/tabid/1120/Default.aspx. |
| Goodman, D. & Hambleton, R. (2004). Student test score reports and interpretive guides: Review of current practices and suggestions for future research. Applied Measurement in Education, 17(2), 145-220. Retrieved September 23, 2008, from http://pdfserve.informaworld.com/789071_775644605_783685471.pdf |
| Haladyna, T. M., & Downing, S. M. (2004, March). Construct-irrelevant variance in high-stakes testing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 23(1). Retrieved January 3, 2007 from http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2004.tb00149.x |
| Halverson, R. & Thomas, C.N. (2007). The roles and practices of student services staff as data-driven instructional leaders. (WCER Working Paper No. 2007-1). Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin Center for Education Research. Retrieved September 15, 2008, from http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/publications/workingPapers/Working_Paper_No_2007_01.pdf |
| Halverson, R., Grigg, J., Prichett, R., & Thomas, C. (2005). The new instructional leadership: Creating data-driven instructional systems in schools. WCER Working Paper 2005-9, Wisconsin Center for Education Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison. Retrieved May 8, 2007 from http://www.academiccolab.org/resources/documents/HalversonGriggPrichettThomas%20NCPEA.pdf |
| Halverson, R., Prichett, R.B., Watson, J.G. (2007). Formative feedback systems and the new instructional leadership. (WCER Working paper No. 2007-3). Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin Center for Education Research.Retrieved September 15, 2008, from http://www.wceruw.net/publications/workingPapers/Working_Paper_No_2007_03.pdf |
| Hamilton, L. (2003). Assessment as a policy tool. Review of Research in Education, 27, 25- 68. |
| Hamilton, L., Halverson, R., Jackson, S., Mandinach, E., Supovitz, J., & Wayman, J. (2009). Using student achievement data to support instructional decision making (NCEE 2009-4067). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/practiceguides/dddm_pg_092909.pdf |
| Harlen, W. (2007). Criteria for evaluating systems for student assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 33(1), 15-28. |
| Harrison, C., & Bryan, C. (2008). Data dialogue: Focused conversations put evidence to work in the classroom. Journal of Staff Development, 29(4), 15-19. |
| Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. Retrieved May 15, 2008 from http://rer.sagepub.com/cgi/content/short/77/1/81 |
| Helwig, R., Anderson, L., & Tindal, G. (2002). Using a concept-grounded curriculum-based measure in mathematics to predict statewide test scores for middle school students with LD. The Journal of Special Education, 36(2), 102-112. |
| Henderson, S., Petrosino, A., Guckenburg, S., & Hamilton, S. (2007). REL Technical Brief-a second follow-up year for "Measuring how benchmark assessments affect student achievement" (REL Technical Brief, REL Northeast and Islands 2007-No. 002). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Northeast and Islands. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs |
| Heritage, M. (2007, October). Formative assessment: What do teachers need to know and do? Phi Delta Kappan, 89(2). Retrieved May 15, 2008 from http://www.pdkintl.org/kappan/k_v89/k0710her.htm |
| Heritage, M. (2008). Learning progressions: Supporting instruction and formative assessment. Washington, D.C.: Council of Chief State School Officers. Retrieved May 9, 2008 from http://www.ccsso.org/content/PDFs/FAST%20Learning%20Progressions.pdf |
| Heritage, M., & Chen, E. (2005, May). Why data skills matter in school improvement. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(9), 707. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. EJ712939) |
| Heritage, M., & Yeagley. R. (2005). Data use and school improvement: Challenges and prospects. In J.L. Herman & E. Haertel (Eds.), Uses and misuses of data for educational accountability and improvement (National Society for the Study of Education Yearbook, Vol. 104, Issue 2, pp. 320-339 ). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education. Distributed by Blackwell Publishing. |
| Heritage, M., Chen, E., & LaTorre, D. (2005). Upgrading America's use of information to improve student performance. (CSE Tech. Rep. No. 661). Los Angeles, CA: Center for the Study of Evaluation and National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing. Retrieved April 9, 2006 from http://www.cresst.org |
| Heritage, M., Kim, J., Vendlinski, T., & Herman, J. (2009). From evidence to action: A seamless process in formative assessment? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 28(3), 24-31. |
| Herman, J. L. & Haertel, E. H. (Eds.) (2005). Uses and misuses of data for educational accountability and improvement (National Society for the Study of Education Yearbook, Vol. 104, Issue 2). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education. Distributed by Blackwell Publishing. |
| Herman, J., & Gribbons, B. (2001, February). Lessons learned in using data to support school inquiry and continuous improvement: Final report to the Stuart Foundation. (CSE Tech. Rep. No. 535). Los Angeles, CA: Center for the Study of Evaluation and National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing. Retrieved April 10, 2006 from http://www.cresst.org |
| Herman, J.L., & Winters, L. (1992). Tracking your school’s success: A guide to sensible evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press, Inc. |
| Herman, J.L., Osmundson, E., Ayala, C., Schneider, S., & Timms, M. (2006, December). The nature and impact of teacher's formative assessment practices. (CSE Tech. Rep. No. 703). Los Angeles, CA: Center for the Study of Evaluation, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing, University of California, Los Angeles. Retrieved May 15, 2008 from http://www.cse.ucla.edu/products/reports/R703.pdf |
| Hoff, D.J. (2006). Delving into data. Education Week, 25 (35), 12-22. Retrieved September 15, 2008, from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=f5h&AN=20878229&site=ehost-live |
| Holcomb, E. L. (2001). Asking the right questions: techniques for collaboration and school change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc. |
| Holcomb, E. L. (2004). Getting excited about data: Combining people, passion, and proof to maximize student achievement. Corwin Press; Second Edition. |
| Honey, M. (2001). The consortium for technology in the preparation of teachers: Exploring the potential of handheld technology for preservice education. New York: EDC/Center for Children and Technology. |
| Honig, M. I., & Coburn, C. E. (2005). When districts use evidence to improve instruction: what do we know and where do we go from here? Voices in Urban Education, 6. Retrieved February 13, 2008 from http://www.annenberginstitute.org/VUE/archives.html. |
| Hostetler, K. (2005). What is "good" education research? Educational Research, 34(6), pp.16-21. Retrieved April 25, 2008 from http://edr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/refs/34/6/16. |
| Huffman, D., & Kalnin, J. (2003). Collaborative inquiry to make data-based decisions in schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 569-580. |
| Ikemoto, G.S. & Marsh, J.A. (2007). Cutting through the "data-driven" mantra: Different conceptions of data-driven decision making. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 106 (1), 105-131. |
| Ingram, D., Louis, K.S., et al. (2004). Accountability policies and teacher decision making: Barriers to the use of data to improve practice. Teachers College Record, 106(6), 1258-1287. |
| Innovation Network, Inc. Data collection tips: Developing a survey. Retrieved January 18, 2008 from the Innovation Network, Inc. website www.innonet.org. |
| Jackl, A., & King, S. (2006). Optimal reference guide: What's behind your data warehouse? Part II. Austin, TX: ESP Solutions Group. Retrieved June 14, 2007 from http://www.espsolutionsgroup.com/resources.php |
| Jain, H., Nazareth, D., & Nelson, R. (2000). Data warehouses in public schools: Lessons learned in an on-going implementation. Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS. Retrieved April 26, 2006 from http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr=&q=cache:QJ0ca9gw92MJ:is.lse.ac.uk/support/AMCIS/AMCIS2000/pdffiles/papers/026.pdf+Data+Warehouses+in+Public+Schools:+Lessons+Learned+in+an+On-Going+Implementation |
| Jandris, T. P. (2002). Data-based decision-making: Essentials for principals. Alexandria, VA: National Association of Elementary School Principals. |
| Jenkins, L. (1997). Improving student learning: Applying Deming's quality principles in classrooms. Milwaukee, WI: ASQC Quality Press. 978-0873895699 |
| Johnson, R. S. (2002). Using data to close the achievement gap: How to measure equity in our schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc. 978-0761945093 |
| Johnstone, C.J., Altman, J., & Thurlow, M. (2006). A state guide to the development of universally designed assessments. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. |
| Joint Committee on Testing Practices. (2005). Code of fair testing practices in education (Revised). Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 24(1), 23-26. Retrieved January 15, 2007 from http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2005.00004.x |
| Keeney, L. (1998). Using data for school improvement: Report on the second practitioners' conference for Annenberg challenge sites. Providence, RI: Annenberg Institute for School Reform. |
| Kerr, K. A., Marsh, J. A., ,Schulyer Ikemoto, G., Darilek, H., & Barney, H. (2006). Strategies to promote data use for instructional improvement: Actions, outcomes, and lessons from three urban districts. American Journal of Education 112(4), 496-520. |
| King, S. & Jackl, A. (2006). Optimal reference guide: What's really "in store" for your data warehouse? Part I. Austin, TX: ESP Solutions Group. Retrieved June 14, 2007 from http://www.espsolutionsgroup.com/resources.php |
| Kirkup, C., Sizmur, J., Sturman, L., & Lewis, K. (2005). Schools' use of data in teaching and learning. London: DfES (DfES RR 671).Retrieved September 7, 2007 from http://www.dfes.gov.uk/research/data/uploadfiles/RR671.pdf |
| Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254-284. |
| Knapp, M. S., Copland, M. A., & Talbert, J. E. (2003, February). Leading for learning: Reflective tools for school and district leaders. Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington. |
| Knapp, M. S., Swinnerton, J. A., Copland, M. A., & Monpas-Huber, J. (2006). Data-informed leadership in education. Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington. Retrieved March 2, 2007 from http://depts.washington.edu/ctpmail/PDFs/DataInformed-Nov1.pdf |
| Lachat, M. A., & Smith, S. (2005). Practices that support data use in urban high schools. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR) 10(3), 333-349. Retrieved February 22, 2007 from http://www.leaonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1207/s15327671espr1003_7 |
| Lachat, M.A. (2001). Data-driven high school reform: The breaking ranks model. Providence, RI: LAB at Brown University. |
| Laird, E. & Reyna, R. (August 2008). Data governance: Changing culture, breaking down silos and deciding who is in control. National Center for Educational Achievement, Data Quality Campaign. |
| Laird, E. (2008). Tapping into the power of longitudinal data: A guide for school leaders. National Center for Educational Accountability, Data Quality Campaign. http://www.dataqualitycampaign.org/files/publications-tapping_into_the_power_of_longitudinal_data-a_guide_for_school_leaders-010108.pdf |
| Lang, S., Stanley, T., & Moore, B. (2008). Short cycle assessment: Improving student achievement through formative assessment. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education. |
| LaRocque, M. (2007). Closing the achievement gap: The experience of a middle school. Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 80(4), 157-161. |
| Leahy,S., Lyon, C., Thompson, M., & Wiliam, D.(2005). Classroom assessment: Minute by minute, day by day. Educational Leadership. 63(3), 18-26. *Used by permission. Learn more about ASCD at www.ascd.org |
| Learning Point Associates & Educational Service Agency (ESA) Alliance of the Midwest. (2006, September). Effective use of electronic data systems: A readiness guide for district and school leaders. Naperville, IL: Learning Point Associates and Educational Service Agency (ESA) Alliance of the Midwest. Retrieved October 16, 2008 from http://www.centerforcsri.org/research/improvement.cgi?st=s&sr=SR005392 |
| Learning Point Associates. (2004, December). Guide to using data in school improvement efforts: A compilation of knowledge from data retreats and data use at Learning Point Associates. Naperville, IL: Learning Point Associates. Retrieved April 12, 2006, from http://www.ncrel.org/datause/howto/guidebook.pdf |
| Learning Point Associates. Data use: Data primer. Retrieved January 18, 2008 from the North Central Regional Educational Laboratory website http://www.ncrel.org/datause/dataprimer/overview.php. |
| Learning Points Associates. (2006). Information systems for school improvement: Resources. Retrieved July 31, 2006 from http://www.learningpt.org/page.php?pageID=26 |
| Leavitt, P., McDaniel, R., & Skogstad, E. (2004). Disaggregating data in schools: Leveraging the information you have. Houston, TX: APQC. |
| Lee, D., & Gavine, D. (2003). Goal-setting and self-assessment in Year 7 students. Educational Research, 45(1), 49-59. |
| Leedy, P. D. & Ormrod, J. E. (2004). Practical research: Planning and design (8th edition). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. 978-0131108950 |
| Levine, E. (2002). Building a data warehouse: How you collect, manage, and report data may be the difference between success and failure. American School Board Journal. Retrieved March 2, 2007 from http://www.asbj.com/2002/11/1102technologyfocus2.html |
| Linn, R. L, & Miller, D. M. (2005). Measurement and assessment in teaching (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall. |
| Linn, R. L., Baker, E. L., & Betebenner, D. W. (2002). Accountability systems: Implications of requirements of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Educational Researcher, 31(6), 3-16. |
| Locke, E., Shaw, K., Saari, L., Latham, G. (1981). Goal-setting and task performance: 1969-1980. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 125-152. |
| Loeb, S., Beteille, T. & Perez, M. (2008). Building an information system to support continuous improvement in California public schools. PACE Policy Brief 08-2. Retrieved September 25, 2008, from http://gse.berkeley.edu/research/pace/reports/PB.08-2.pdf |
| Looking at Student Work. Retreived January 18, 2008 from the Looking at Student Work website www.lasw.org. |
| Love, N. (2002). Using data/getting results: A practical guide for school improvement in mathematics and science. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon Publishers, Inc. |
| Love, N. (2004). Taking data to new depths. Journal of Staff Development 25(4), 22-26. Retrieved May 8, 2007 from http://www.nsdc.org/library/publications/jsd/love254.pdf |
| Love, N., Stile, K., Mundry, S., & DiRanna, K. (2007). The data coach's guide to improving learning for all students: Unleashing the power of collaborative inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. |
| Love, N., Stiles, K.E., Mundry, S., & DiRanna, K. (2008). Passion and principle: Ground effective data use. Journal of Staff Development, 29(4), 10-14. |
| Mandinach, E. B., Honey, M., & Light, D. (2006). A theoretical framework for data-driven decision making. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA. Retrieved April 6, 2007 from http://cct.edc.org/admin/publications/speeches/DataFrame_AERA06.pdf |
| Mandinach, E. B., Honey, M., Light, D., Heinze, C., & Rivas, L. (2005). Creating an evaluation framework for data-driven decision-making. EDC Center for Children and Technology. Retrieved May 8, 2007 from http://www.iste.org/Content/NavigationMenu/Research/NECC_Research_Paper_Archives/NECC_2005/Mandinach-Ellen-NECC05.pdf |
| Mandinach, E. B., Rivas, L., Light, D., Heinze, C., & Honey, M. (2006). The impact of data-driven decision making tools on educational practice: A systems analysis of six school districts. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA. Retrieved April 6, 2007 from http://cct.edc.org/admin/publications/speeches/Data_AERA06.pdf |
| Mandinach, E.B., & Honey, M. (Eds.) (2008). Data-driven school improvement: Linking data and learning. New York: Teachers College Press. |
| Marsh, J. A., Pane, J. F., & Hamilton, L. S. (2006). Making sense of data-driven decision making in education. RAND Corporation. Retrieved December 14, 2006 from http://www.rand.org/pubs/occasional_papers/2006/RAND_OP170.pdf |
| Marsh, J., Kerr, K., Ikemoto, G., Darilek, H., Suttorp, M.J., Zimmer, R., et al. (2005). The role of districts in fostering instructional improvement: Lessons from three urban districts partnered with the Institute for Learning. MG-361-WFHF. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. Retrieved November 5, 2007, from http://ww.rand.org/pubs/mongraphs/MG361/ |
| Mason, S. (2002). Turning data into knowledge: Lessons from six Milwaukee public schools. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. Retrieved April 10, 2006, from http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/archive/mps/AERA2002/Mason%20AERA%202002%20QSP%20Symposium%20Paper.pdf |
| Massell, D. (2000). The district role in building capacity: Four strategies. (CPRE Policy Brief No. RB-32). Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania. Retrieved October 27, 2008 from http://www.cpre.org/images/stories/cpre_pdfs/rb32.pdf |
| Massell, D. (2001). The theory and practice of using data to build capacity: State and local strategies and their effects. In Susan H. Fuhrman (Ed.), From the Capitol to the Classroom: Standards-Based Reform in the States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. |
| McDonald, B. & Boud, D. (2003). The impact of self-assessment on achievement: The effects of self-assessment training on performance in external examinations. Assessment in Education, 10(2), 209-220. |
| McDonald, S., Andal, J., Brown, K., & Schneider, B. (2007). Getting the evidence for evidence-based initiatives: How the Midwest states use data systems to improve education processes and outcomes (Issues & Answers Report, REL 2007–No. 016). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Midwest. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs. |
| McIntire, T. (2004). Eight buying tips: Data warehouses. Technology & Learning 25(1). Retrieved April 24, 2007 from http://www.techlearning.com/showArticle.php?articleID=26806926 |
| McMillan, J. H. (2001). Essential assessment concepts for teachers and administrators. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc. 978-0803968400 |
| McMillan, J.H. (Ed.). (2008). Formative classroom assessment: Theory into practice. New York: Teachers College Columbia University. |
| McTighe, J., & O'Connor, K. (2005). Seven practices for effective learning. Educational Leadership. 63(3),10-17. Retrieved May 15, 2008 from http://woodard.latech.edu/~pleonard/epas_report_2005_06/products/additional_resources/jan_28_wkshp/seven_practices.pdf |
| Means, B., Padilla, C., DeBarger, A., & Bakia, M. (2009). Implementing data-informed decision making in schools: Teacher access, supports, and use. Report prepared for U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development. Prepared by SRI International, Menlo Park, CA. |
| Mercurius, N. (2005, October). Scrubbing data for D3M. T.H.E. Journal. Retrieved April 26, 2006 from http://thejournal.com/articles/17433 |
| Mertens, D. M. (2005). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, and mixed methods, 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. 978-0761928058 |
| Mertler, C. A. (2007, December). Interpreting standardized test scores: Strategies for data-driven instruction decision making. California: Sage Publications. |
| Mieles, T. & Foley, E. (2005). Data warehousing: Preliminary findings from a study of implementing districts. Philadelphia: Annenberg Institute for School Reform. Retrieved April 12, 2006 from http://annenberginstitute.org/EKF/images/DataWarehousing.pdf |
| Mieles, T., & Foley, E. (2005). From data to decisions: Lessons from school districts using data warehousing. Providence, RI: Annenberg. |
| Mills, L. B. (2008, March). Getting started with data warehousing: The first in a series on how to manage data efficiently. Technology & Learning, 28(8), 31. |
| Minstrell, J. (1989). Teaching science for understanding. In L. B. Resnick & L. E. Klopfer (Eds.), Toward the thinking curriculum: Current cognitive research (pp. 129-149). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. |
| Moss, P. (2003, Winter). Reconceptualizing validity for classroom assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 22(4), 13-25. |
| National Center for Education Statistics. (2001, January). Technology @ your fingertips, version 2.0. Retrieved April 10, 2006 from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs98/98293rev.pdf |
| National Center for Education Statistics. NCES handbooks online. Retrieved May 19, 2006 from B191 |
| National Forum on Education Statistics (2002). Safety in numbers: Collecting and using crime, violence, and discipline incident data to make a difference in schools (NCES 2002-312). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Retrieved September 30, 2008, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2002/2002312.pdf |
| National Forum on Education Statistics (2003). Weaving a secure web around education: A guide to technology standards and security (NCES 2003- 381). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Retrieved September 30, 2008, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2003/2003381.pdf |
| National Forum on Education Statistics. (2004). Forum guide to building a culture of quality data: A school & district resource (NFES 2005-801). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved December 1, 2006 from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2005/2005801.pdf |
| National Forum on Education Statistics. (2004). Forum guide to protecting the privacy of student information: State and local education agencies, (NCES 2004-330). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved December 1, 2006 from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2004/2004330.pdf |
| National Forum on Education Statistics. (2005). Forum guide to education indicators. U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved December 1, 2006 from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2005/2005802.pdf |
| National Research Council. (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Committee on the Foundations of Assessment. Pellegrino, J., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (Eds.). Board on Testing and Assessment, Center for Education. Division on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. |
| Natriello, G. (1987). The impact of evaluation processes on students. Educational Psychologist, 22, 155-175. |
| NCES Nonfiscal Data Handbook for Early Childhood, Elementary, and Secondary Education (2007). Retrieved February 28, 2008 from http://nces.ed.gov/forum/pub_2003419.asp |
| NEA Foundation for the Improvement of Education. (2003). Using data about classroom practice and student work to improve professional development for educators. Washington, DC: NEA Foundation for the Improvement of Education. |
| Nelson, M., & Eddy, R. M. (2008, Spring). Evaluative thinking and action in the classroom. New Directions for Evaluation, 117, 37-46. |
| Newmann, F. M., King, M. B., & Rigdon, M. (1996). Accountability and school performance: Implications from restructuring schools. Final deliverable. Wisconsin: February 15, 2007 from ERIC database. |
| Nichols, P. D., Meyers, J. L., & Burling, K. S. (2009). A framework for evaluating and planning assessments intended to improve student achievement. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 28(3), 14-23. |
| O'Donnell, A.M., & King, A. (Eds.). (1999). Cognitive perspectives on peer learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. |
| O'Leary, Z. (2004). The essential guide to doing research. London: SAGE Publications. 978-0761941996 |
| Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2005). Formative assessment: Improving student learning in secondary classrooms. Centre for Educational Research and Innovation. Retrieved May 9, 2008 from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/19/31/35661078.pdf |
| Palaich, R.M., Good, D.G., & Van Der Ploeg, A. (2004, June). State education data systems that increase learning and improve accountability. North Central Regional Educational Laboratory. Retrieved April 10, 2006 from http://www.ncrel.org/policy/pubs/pdfs/pivol16.pdf |
| Pellegrino, J.W. (2006). Rethinking and redesigning curriculum, instruction, and assessment: What contemporary research and theory suggests (A paper commissioned by the National Center for the New Commission on the Skills of the American Workforce). Retrieved October 29, 2008 from http://www.skillscommission.org/pdf/commissioned_papers/Rethinking%20and%20Redesigning.pdf |
| Perie, M., Marion, S., & Gong, B. (2009). Moving toward a comprehensive assessment system: A framework for considering interim assessments. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 28(3), 5-13. |
| Petrides, L. A., & Guiney, S. Z. (2002, December). Knowledge management for school leaders: An ecological framework for thinking schools. Teachers College Record, 104(8), 1702- 1717. |
| Petrides, L., & Nodine, T. (2005). Anatomy of school system improvement: Performance-driven practices in urban school districts. San Francisco, CA: Institute for the Study of Knowledge Management in Education & NewSchools Venture Fund. Retrieved February 15, 2007 from http://www.newschools.org/viewpoints/documents/District_Performance_Practices.pdf |
| Pijanowski, L. (2008). Striking a balance: Georgia district adds assessments and transforms classroom practice. Journal of Staff Development, 29(4), 43-46. |
| Popham, W.J. (2003). Test better, teach better: The instructional role of assessment. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. |
| Popham, W.J. (2008). Transformative assessment. Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. |
| Porter, A. C., Chester, M. D., & Schlesinger, M. D. (2004). Framework for an effective assessment and accountability program: The Philadelphia example. Teachers College Record 106(6), 1358-1400. |
| Preuss, P.G. (2003). School leader’s guide to root cause analysis: Using data to dissolve problems. Larchmont, NY: Eye On Education, Inc. 978-1930556539 |
| Process for Developing Learning Communities. Retrieved January 25, 2008 from the Southwest Educational Development Laboratory (SEDL) website http://www.sedl.org/pubs/change34/6.html |
| Protheroe, N. (2001). Improving teaching and learning with data-based decisions: Asking the right questions and acting on the answers. Retrieved May 17, 2007 from Education Research Service http://www.ers.org/spectrum/sum01a.htm |
| RAND Corporation. (2005). Advancing systemwide instructional reform: Lessons from three urban districts partnered with the Institute for Learning. Santa Monica, CA. |
| Rea-Dickens, P. (2001). Mirror, mirror on the wall: Identifying the processes of classroom assessment. Language Testing, 18, 429-462. |
| Reeves, D. B. (2004). The leader's guide to standards: A blueprint for educational equity and excellence. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. |
| Regional Educational Laboratory Midwest. (2008). Using multiple levels of data to address educational issues. (Policy Brief No. 1, June 2008). Retrieved from http://www.learningpt.org/aboutus/howwework/centers/RELpubs/June2008Brief.pdf |
| Reitz, R., & Winter, C. (2004). Growing pains: Piloting a statewide information system is difficult but worth the effort. Retrieved April 10, 2006 from American http://www.asbj.com/specialreports/0904SpecialReports/S4.html |
| Retrieved December 18, 2007 from http://usingdata.terc.edu/ |
| Retrieved January 24, 2008 from http://cep.terc.edu/dec/ |
| Retrieved January 25, 2008 from The Education Trust website www2.edtrust.org |
| Retrieved January 25, 2008 from the National School Reform Faculty website www.nsrfhamrony.org. |
| Retrieved January 25, 2008 from the Technical Education Research Centers (TERC) website http://www.terc.edu/ourwork/usingdata.html. |
| Rothman, R. (2008). Data-informed decision making: Using data wisely and well. Voices in Urban Education, 18. Retrieved February 28, 2008 from http://www.annenberginstitute.org/VUE/winter08/Rothman.php |
| Rowntree, D. (2003). Statistics without tears: A primer for non-mathematicians. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon Inc. 978-0024040909 |
| Rudner, L. M. (1994). Questions to ask when evaluating tests. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 4(2). Retrieved June 5, 2006 from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=4&n=2 |
| Ruiz-Primo, M.A., & Furtak, E.M. (2007). Exploring teachers' informal formative assessment practices and students' understanding of the context of scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(1), 57-84. |
| Russell, M., Bebell, D., O'Dwyer, L., & O'Connor, K. (2003). Examining teacher technology use. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(4), 297-310. |
| Sadler, D.R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119-144. |
| Sadler, D.R. (1998). Formative assessment: Revisiting the territory. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 77-84. |
| Safer, N., & Fleischman, S. (2005). How student progress monitoring improves instruction. Educational Leadership, 62(5), 81-83. Retrieved October 1, 2008 from http://www.ascd.org/authors/ed_lead/el200502_safer.html |
| Sarmiento, J. W. (2003). Technology tools for the analysis of achievement data: An introductory guide for educational leaders. Philadelphia: Laboratory for Student Success, Temple University. Retrieved June 14, 2007 from http://www.nwrel.org/scpd/sslc/federal_grantees/cohort2/ data_institutes/binder/resources/C2DataTechToolsforAnalysis.pdf |
| Sato, M., Coffey, J., & Moorthy, M. (2005). Two teachers making assessment for learning their own. The Curriculum Journal, 16(2), 177-191. |
| Schafer, W.D. (1993). Assessment literacy for teachers. Theory into Practice, 32(2), 118-126. College of Education, The Ohio State University. |
| Schmoker, M. (1999). Results: The key to continuous school improvement, second edition. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. |
| Schmoker, M. (2003). First things first: Demystifying data analysis. Educational Leadership, 60(5), pp.22-24. Retrieved January 18, 2008 from website http://mikeschmoker.com/data-analysis.html |
| Schools Interoperability Framework Association. Retrieved June 14, 2007 from http://www.sifinfo.org/ |
| Sharkey, N. S., & Murnane, R. J. (2006). Tough choices in designing a formative assessment system. American Journal of Education 112(4), 572-588. |
| Shavelson, R.J., Baxter, G.P., & Pine, J. (1992, May). Performance assessments: Political rhetoric and measurement reality. Educational Researcher 4(21), 22-27. |
| Shepard, L. A. (1993). Evaluating test validity. In L. Darling-Hammond (Ed.), Review in research in education, vol. 19. Washington, DC: AERA. |
| Shepard, L. A. (2009). Commentary: Evaluating the validity of formative and interim assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 28(3), 32-37. |
| Shepard, L.A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4-14. |
| Shepard, L.A. (2005). Linking formative assessment to scaffolding. Educational Leadership, 63(3), 66-70. *Used by permission. Learn more about ASCD at www.ascd.org |
| Shepard, L.A. (2005, October). Will commercialization enable or destroy formative assessment? (Original title: Formative assessment: Caveat emptor). Paper presented at the ETS Invitational Conference 2005: The Future of Assessment, Shaping Teaching and Learning, New York. |
| Shepard, L.A. (February 2000). The role of classroom assessment in teaching and learning. (CSE Tech. Rep. No. 517). Los Angeles, CA: Center for the Study of Evaluation, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing, University of California, Los Angeles. |
| Shute, V.J. (2007, March). Focus on formative feedback. (ETS Research Report Number RR-07-01). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. Retrieved May 15, 2008 from http://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/RR-07-11.pdf |
| Sirotnik, K.A., & Kimball, K. (1999, November). Standards for standards-based accountability systems. Phi Delta Kappan, 81(3), 209-214. Retrieved February 13, 2008 from http://www.pdkintl.org/kappan/ksir9911.htm |
| Smith, E. & Gorard, S. (2005). 'They don't give us our marks': The role of formative feedback in student progress. Assessment in Education, 12(1), 21-38. |
| Smith, J. (2003). Reconsidering reliability in classroom assessment and grading. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 22(4), 26-33. |
| Snipes, J., Doolittle, F., & Herlihy, C. (2002). Foundations for success: Case studies of how urban school systems improve student achievement. Washington, DC: Council of the Great City Schools. Retrieved April 10, 2006 from http://www.cgcs.org/pdfs/Foundations.pdf |
| Spillane, J.P. (2005). Distributed leadership. The Educational Forum, 69 (2), 143-150. Retrieved October 6, 2008, from http://pdfserve.informaworld.com/745466_770849120_790169944.pdf |
| Stein, M. (2003). Making sense of the data: Overview of the K-12 data management and analysis market. Boston, MA: Eduventures. Retrieved December 7, 2006 from http://www.3d2know.org/making_sense_of_the_data.pdf |
| Stiggins, R. (2005). From formative assessment to assessment for learning: A path to success in standards-based schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(3). |
| Stiggins, R. (2006). Assessment for learning: A key to motivation and achievement. Edge, 2(2), 3-19. |
| Stiggins, R. (2006). Balanced assessment systems: Redefining excellence in assessment. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. *Reprinted by permission of Educational Testing Service, the copyright owner. No endorsement of this web site or publication by Educational Testing Service should be inferred. |
| Stiggins, R. (2007). Assessments through the student’s eyes. Educational Leadership, 64(8), 22-26. Retrieved October 12, 2009, from http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational_leadership/may07/vol64/num08/Assessment_Through_the_Student's_Eyes.aspx |
| Stiggins, R. J. (1994). Student-centered classroom assessment. New York: Macmillan College Publishing Company. Inc. 978-0134329314 |
| Stiggins, R., & Duke, D. (2008). Effective instructional leadership requires assessment leadership. Phi Delta Kappan, 90(4), 285-291. |
| Stiggins, R.J. (2002, June). Assessment crisis: The absence of assessment FOR learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(10), 758-765. |
| Stipek, D.J. (1998). Motivation to learn (2nd ed). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon. |
| Streifer, P. A. & Schumann, J. A. (2005). Using data mining to identify actionable information: Breaking new ground in data-driven decision making. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR) 10(3), 281-293. Retrieved February 22, 2007 from http://www.leaonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1207/s15327671espr1003_4 |
| Streifer, P. A. (2004). Tools and techniques for effective data-driven decision-making. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press. |
| Stringfield, S., Wayman, J. C., & Yakimowski, M. (2005). Scaling up data use in classrooms, schools and districts. In Dede, C., Honan, J., & Peters, L. (Eds.), Scaling up success: Lessons learned from technology-based educational innovation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. |
| Supovitz, J. & Klein, V. (2003, November). Mapping a course for improved student learning: How innovative schools systematically use student performance data to guide improvement. University of Pennsylvania Graduate School of Education: Consortium for Policy Research in Education. Retrieved December 14, 2006 from http://www.cpre.org/Publications/Publications_Research.htm |
| Supovitz, J.A. (2005). Small learning communities that actually learn: Lessons for school leaders. Phi Delta Kappan, 86 (9), 649-651. |
| Supovitz, J.A. (2006). The case for district-based reform: Leading, building, and sustaining school improvement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press. |
| Sutherland, S. (2004). Creating a culture of data use for continuous improvement: A case study of an Edison Project School. American Journal of Evaluation 25(3), 277-293. Retrieved March 2, 2007 from http://aje.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/25/3/277 |
| Symonds, K. W. (2004). After the test: Closing the achievement gaps with data. San Francisco: Bay Area School Reform Collaborative. Retrieved October 16, 2008 from http://www.ncrel.org/gap/studies/basrc.htm |
| T.H.E. Journal. Retrieved April 9, 2006 from http://www.thejournal.com/ |
| The Datause Website. Retrieved May 1, 2006 from http://edadmin.edb.utexas.edu/datause/publications.htm |
| Thompson, M., & Wiliam, D. (2007). Tight but loose: A conceptual framework for scaling up school reform. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), April 9 – April 13, 2007, Chicago, IL. *Reprinted by permission of Educational Testing Service, the copyright owner. No endorsement of this web site or publication by Educational Testing Service should be inferred. |
| Thorn, C. A. (2001, November 19). Knowledge management for educational information systems: What is the state of the field? Education Policy Analysis Archives, 9(47). Retrieved April 10, 2006 from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v9n47/ |
| Thorn, C., Watson, J., & Zeyher, S. (2001, June). Analysis of education information systems in the context of systemic reform. (Research Monograph No. 22). Madison: University of Wisconsin, National Institute for Science Education. Retrieved April 10, 2006 from http://facstaff.wcer.wisc.edu/normw/WebbMonograph22.pdf |
| Thorn, C.A. (2002). Data use in the school and classroom: The challenges of implementing data-based decision making inside schools. WCER Working Paper No. 2002-2. Madision, WI: Wisconsin Center for Education Research. Retrieved September 22, 2008, from http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/Publications/workingPapers/Working_Paper_No_2002_2.pdf |
| Threlfall, J. (2005). The formative use of assessment information in planning- The notion of contingent planning. British Journal of Educational Studies, 53(1), 54-65. |
| Tierney, R.D. & Charland, J. (2007, April). Stocks and prospects: Research on formative assessment in secondary education classrooms. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL. |
| Tierney, R.D. (2006). Changing practices: Influences on classroom assessment. Assessment in Education, 13(3), 239-264. |
| Tognieri, W., & Anderson, S.E. (2003). Beyond islands of excellence: What districts can do to improve instruction and achievement in all schools. Washington, DC: Learning First Alliance. Retrieved April 8, 2006 from http://www.learningfirst.org/publications/districts/ |
| Tomlinson, C. A. (2007). Learning to love assessment. Educational Leadership, 64(4), 8-13. |
| Torrance, H., & Pryor, J. (1998). Investigating formative assessment. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press. |
| Tufte, E.R. (2001). The visual display of quantitative information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press. |
| Tunstall, P., & Gipps, C.V. (1996). 'How does your teacher help you to make your work better?' Children's understanding of formative assessment. The Curriculum Journal, 7(2), 185-203. |
| Tunstall, P., & Gipps, C.V. (1996). Teacher feedback to young children in formative assessment: A typology. British Educational Research Journal, 22(4), 389-404. |
| U.S. Department of Education, Office of Elementary and Secondary Education. (2006, April). Improving data quality for Title I standards, assessments, and accountability reporting guidelines for states, LEAs, and schools. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved May 10, 2006 http://www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/guid/standardsassessment/nclbdataguidance.pdf |
| U.S. Department of Education. (2003, February). U. S. Department of Education information quality guidelines. Retrieved May 19, 2006, from http://www.ed.gov/policy/gen/guid/iq/infoqualguide.pdf |
| Using data. Retrieved May 1, 2006, from http://usingdata.terc.edu/toplevel/home.cfm |
| Valli, L. & Buese, D. (2007). The changing role of teachers in an era of high-stakes accountability. American Educational Research Journal, 44(3), 519-558. |
| Van Petegem, P., Vanhoof, J., Daems,F., Mahieu, P. (2005). Publishing information on individual schools? Educational Research and Evaluation, 11 (1), 45-60. Retrieved September 15, 2008 from http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdf?vid=2&hid=106&sid=16143c7a-79e7-4891-9fb3-dc683da76594%40sessionmgr109 |
| Villano, M. (2007, September). Data-driven decision making: The "other" data. T.H.E. Journal, 34(9), 46-52. Retrieved October 28, 2008 from http://www.thejournal.com/articles/21237_7 |
| Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. |
| Walberg, H. J. (2007). Handbook on restructuring and substantial school improvement. Lincoln, IL: Center on Innovation & Improvement. Retrieved August 7, 2007 from http://www.centerii.org/handbook/download/Restructuring%20Handbook.pdf |
| Wall, J. E., & Waltz, G. R. (Eds.). (2004). Measuring up: Assessment issues for teachers, counselors, and administrators. Austin, TX: PRO-ED, Inc. |
| Watson, J. (2002, April). QSP and the MPS information system. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED472177) |
| Wayman, J. C. & Conoly, K. (2006). Managing curriculum. Rapid implementation of a districtwide data initiative. ERS Spectrum, 24(2), 4-8. Retrieved October 16, 2008 from http://edadmin.edb.utexas.edu/datause/publications.htm |
| Wayman, J. C. & Stringfield, S. (2003). Teacher-friendly options to improve teaching through student data analysis. Paper presented at the 2003 Annual Meeting of the American Association for Teaching and Curriculum, Baltimore, MD, October. Retrieved January 10, 2007 from http://www.csos.jhu.edu/datause/papers/aatc_teacher-friendly_software.pdf |
| Wayman, J. C. & Stringfield, S. (2006). Technology-supported involvement of entire faculties in examination of student data for instructional improvement. American Journal of Education 112(4), 549-571. Retrieved December 1, 2006 from http://edadmin.edb.utexas.edu/datause/papers/Wayman-Stringfield-Faculty-Data-Use.pdf |
| Wayman, J. C. (2005). Guest editor's introduction. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR) 10(3), 235-239. Retrieved February 22, 2007 from http://www.leaonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1207/s15327671espr1003_1 |
| Wayman, J. C. (2005). Involving teachers in data-based decision-making: Using computer data systems to support teacher inquiry and reflection. Journal of Education for Students Placed At Risk, 10(3), 295-308. Retrieved April 9, 2006 http://edadmin.edb.utexas.edu/datause/publications.htm |
| Wayman, J. C. (2007). Student data systems for school improvement: The state of the field. In TCEA Educational Technology Research Symposium: Vol. 1 (pp. 156-162). Lancaster, PA: ProActive Publications. Retrieved October 16, 2008 from http://edadmin.edb.utexas.edu/datause/publications.htm |
| Wayman, J. C., Midgley, S. & Stringfield, S. (2006). Leadership for data-based decision-making: Collaborative data teams. In Danzig, A., Borman, K., Jones, B., & Wright, B. (Eds.), New models of professional development for learner centered leadership. Erlbaum. Retrieved October 16, 2008 from http://edadmin.edb.utexas.edu/datause/publications.htm |
| Wayman, J. C., & Cho, V. (2008). Preparing educators to effectively use student data systems. In Kowalski, T. J., & Lasley, T. J. (Eds.), Handbook on data-based decision-making in education (pp. 89-104). New York: Routledge. |
| Wayman, J. C., Brewer, C., & Stringfield, S. (2009, April). Leadership for effective data use. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA. |
| Wayman, J. C., Cho, V., & Johnston, M. T. (2007). The data-informed district: A district-wide evaluation of data use in the Natrona County School District. Austin: The University of Texas. Retrieved October 16, 2008 from http://edadmin.edb.utexas.edu/datause/publications.htm |
| Wayman, J. C., Stringfield, S., & Yakimowski, M. (2004). Software enabling school improvement through the analysis of student data. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Center for Research on the Education of Students Placed At Risk. Retrieved April 9, 2006, from http://edadmin.edb.utexas.edu/datause/publications.htm |
| Wayman, J.C., & Stringfield, S. (2006). Data use for school improvement: School practices and research perspectives. American Journal of Education 112(4), 463-468. |
| WestEd. (2002). Improving districts: Systems that support learning. San Francisco: Author. |
| Wiggins, G. P. (1998). Educative assessment: Designing assessments to inform and improve student performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 978-0787908485 |
| Wiliam, D. (2006, July). Does assessment hinder learning? Paper presented at the ETS Invitational Seminar at the Institute of Civil Engineers, London, UK. |
| Wiliam, D. (2007). Changing classroom practice. Educational Leadership, 64(4), 36-42. |
| Wiliam, D. (2007). Keeping learning on track: Classroom assessment and the regulation of learning. In F.K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of mathematics teaching and learning, 1053-1098, Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing. |
| Wiliam, D., & Thompson, M. (2007). Integrating assessment with learning: What will it take to make it work? In C.A. Dwyer (Ed.), The future of assessment: Shaping teaching and learning. Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. |
| Wiliam, D., Lee, C., Harrison, C., & Black, P. (2004, March). Teachers developing assessment for learning: Impact on student achievement. Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice 11(1), 49-65. |
| Williams, T., Kirst, M., Haertel, E., et al. (2005). Similar students, different results: Why do some schools do better? A large-scale survey of California elementary schools serving low-income students. Mountain View, CA: EdSource. Retrieved April 9, 2006 from http://www.edsource.org/pdf/simstusumm06.pdf |
| Wilson, Mark (Ed.). (2004). Towards coherence between classroom assessment and accountability. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. |
| Wurtzel, J., Marion, S., Perie, M., & Gong, B. (2009). The role of interim assessments in a comprehensive assessment system. In L.M. Pinkus (Ed.) Meaningful Measurement: The Role of Assessments in Improving High School Education in the Twenty-First Century (pp. 77-94). Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education. |
| Yackel, E., Cobb, P., & Wood, T. (1991). Small-group interactions as a source of learning opportunities in second-grade mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22(5), 390-408. *Reprinted with permission from Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, copyright 1991 by the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. All rights reserved. |
| Young, V. M. (2006). Teacher's use of data: Loose coupling, agenda setting, and team norms. American Journal of Education 112(4), 521-548. |
| Zhao, Y., & Frank, K.A. (2003). Factors affecting technology uses in schools: An ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 807-840. Retrieved April 9, 2006 http://www.msu.edu/~kenfrank/papers/Factors%20affecting%20technology%20uses%20in%20schools.pdf |
| Zimmerman, B.J. (1986). Becoming a self-regulated learner: Which are the key subprocesses? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11(4), 307-313. |